From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4229 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2014 13:16:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4219 invoked by uid 89); 23 Sep 2014 13:16:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:16:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8NDGSjI029501 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:16:29 -0400 Received: from blade.nx (ovpn-116-80.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.80]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8NDGSSY004874; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:16:28 -0400 Received: by blade.nx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 79A3E2623D0; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:16:27 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:16:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: Pedro Alves Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Doug Evans , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: time to workaround libc/13097 in fsf gdb? Message-ID: <20140923131627.GA6185@blade.nx> References: <5411CFAE.7040805@redhat.com> <20140912115452.GA5626@host2.jankratochvil.net> <5412E3AC.80203@redhat.com> <20140912123320.GA8704@host2.jankratochvil.net> <5412EB1F.40309@redhat.com> <20140917201049.GA22880@host2.jankratochvil.net> <541C3FCF.4000400@redhat.com> <20140920195017.GA5931@host2.jankratochvil.net> <54215700.30402@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54215700.30402@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00687.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > On 09/20/2014 08:50 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > Then it is (IMO) most time effective to rewrite GDB to C++ > > first. [snip] > Let me remind you that I'm still on the C++ camp. Last we > discussed this, I suggested that we should have a wiki page > describing the project, summarizing previous discussions, > previously identified obstacles, proposed solutions for same, > listing a suggested conversion roadmap ("gcc -Wc++-compat" > -> "still C but built with g++", etc.), etc. That hasn't > happened yet. This is my fault, it was on my task list and I haven't done it. Sorry, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/