From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26619 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2014 13:15:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26608 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2014 13:15:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.110) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:15:38 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:15:35 +0100 Received: from d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.14) by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.144) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:15:32 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71F62190045 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:15:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s8ADFWP124903698 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:15:32 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s8ADFU8u012282 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:15:31 -0600 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with SMTP id s8ADFTMq012223; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:15:29 -0600 Message-Id: <201409101315.s8ADFTMq012223@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:15:29 +0200 Subject: Re: eliminate deprecated_insert_raw_breakpoint. what's left. To: brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:15:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: peterschauer@gmx.net (Peter Schauer), palves@redhat.com (Pedro Alves), gdb-patches@sourceware.org (GDB Patches) In-Reply-To: <20140910122126.GK28404@adacore.com> from "Joel Brobecker" at Sep 10, 2014 05:21:26 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14091013-1948-0000-0000-000001115A15 X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00303.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > I've now got access to an AIX 6.1 machine and repeated the experiment -- > > with the same result. No regressions when zapping exec_one_dummy_insn, > > and in fact about 100 FAILs fixed. > > > > So I think we should probably just do it at this point. > > Agreed! Would you do the honors, or would you like me to? > > Thanks for doing the testing, Ulrich. I'll check it in shortly. Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com