From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21153 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2014 12:21:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21143 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2014 12:21:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:21:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13833116146; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 08:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id z2QstjpQAE4q; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 08:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98872116139; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 08:21:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8C38C477FF; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 05:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:21:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Peter Schauer , Pedro Alves , GDB Patches Subject: Re: eliminate deprecated_insert_raw_breakpoint. what's left. Message-ID: <20140910122126.GK28404@adacore.com> References: <201409091237.s89CbnwW017512@licht.localdomain> <201409092124.s89LOpVQ025583@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201409092124.s89LOpVQ025583@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00294.txt.bz2 > I've now got access to an AIX 6.1 machine and repeated the experiment -- > with the same result. No regressions when zapping exec_one_dummy_insn, > and in fact about 100 FAILs fixed. > > So I think we should probably just do it at this point. Agreed! Would you do the honors, or would you like me to? Thanks for doing the testing, Ulrich. -- Joel