From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21581 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2014 06:08:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21568 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2014 06:08:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 06:08:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AF0116386; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:08:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HTf1-qjDtK7o; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:08:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01961116369; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:08:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 73FD547588; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:08:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 06:08:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Joel Sherrill Cc: Mike Frysinger , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Doug Evans Subject: Re: Fix spelling error in psim Message-ID: <20140827060847.GB8290@adacore.com> References: <53F5250D.4030301@oarcorp.com> <6224461.lknybP5UIy@vapier> <20140821071535.GK1773@adacore.com> <53F5F848.9040709@oarcorp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53F5F848.9040709@oarcorp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00544.txt.bz2 > Let me fix the spelling issues first. Is that OK? > > I am not opposed to fixing the style issues but really don't have to get > sucked into them right now. That would be absolutely fine. The fact that you are improving one area does not mean that you are then responsible for making that particular area perfect. -- Joel