From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26546 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2014 17:37:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26337 invoked by uid 89); 6 Aug 2014 17:37:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 17:37:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93699116718; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:37:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id wIMMcRMeujP6; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:37:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311D8116712; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:37:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E1A840EE3; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 10:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 17:37:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: vapier@gentoo.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, monaka@monami-software.com Subject: Re: [doc] Avoid conflicts between gdb and cross-gdb. Message-ID: <20140806173705.GA4881@adacore.com> References: <20140801150722.GJ14672@adacore.com> <3531941.zJjkhARRvn@vapier> <20140806132435.GC5204@adacore.com> <837g2lpmzz.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <837g2lpmzz.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 > I'm not sure I agree. What other projects do that? I never saw any > transformed Info manual. And we never did that before, so why now? > > Besides, why do that? The Info manual does not include any > system-specific information, it is valid for all supported systems. > So I see no reason to put it into a system-dependent place or call it > by system-dependent name. > > What am I missing? Maybe you are right. I just found it odd that you'd do "man powerpc-elf-gdb" but then do "info gdb", even if the debugger you have is called "powerpc-elf-gdb". -- Joel