From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Keven Boell <keven.boell@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Keven Boell <keven.boell@intel.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, sanimir.agovic@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/23] dwarf: add dwarf3 DW_OP_push_object_address opcode
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140621152145.GA4417@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53A0470E.9050206@linux.intel.com>
> So I think having only the address here seems to be ok.
[...]
> I agree with you that having a struct value instead of an address gives
> more flexibility, but for now I think this is not required according to
> the DWARF standard. If there is a real-world use-case where a full struct
> value object is required instead of having only the address, then this
> functionality can be added after this patch series.
Thanks for taking the time to try to answer my questions. It all
seems reasonable to you, so I agree with your suggestion. I'd like
to add a function that resolves a value - that way, the work is
going to be centralized at one place. But I would think that
I can take care of this independently of your patch series, so
you do not need to worry about that for this series.
> The patch series has been outdated, due to the introduction of two new
> functions by Tom (resolve_dynamic_struct and resolve_dynamic_union).
> Shall I therefore submit version 2?
Sure. Thanks!
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-21 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-04 5:54 [PATCH 00/23] Fortran dynamic array support Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 12/23] test: basic tests for dynamic array evaluations in Fortran Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 10/23] vla: get Fortran dynamic strings working Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 14/23] test: evaluate dynamic arrays using Fortran primitives Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 07/23] vla: use value constructor instead of raw-buffer manipulation Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 16/23] test: correct ptype of dynamic arrays in Fortran Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 05/23] vla: make field selection work with vla Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 03/23] vla: introduce allocated/associated flags Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 06/23] vla: reconstruct value to compute bounds of target type Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 13/23] test: evaluate Fortran dynamic arrays of types Keven Boell
2014-06-16 20:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 20/23] test: dynamic string evaluations Keven Boell
2014-06-16 18:41 ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-17 13:52 ` Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 15/23] test: dynamic arrays passed to subroutines Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 08/23] vla: get dynamic array corner cases to work Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 04/23] vla: make dynamic fortran arrays functional Keven Boell
2014-06-16 21:02 ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-17 13:53 ` Keven Boell
2014-06-17 17:26 ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 23/23] test: stride support for dynamic arrays Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:54 ` [PATCH 11/23] vla: add stride support to fortran arrays Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:55 ` [PATCH 17/23] test: evaluating allocation/association status Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:55 ` [PATCH 02/23] dwarf: add DW_AT_data_location support Keven Boell
2014-06-10 12:10 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-11 12:29 ` Keven Boell
2014-06-14 13:21 ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-04 5:55 ` [PATCH 21/23] test: basic MI test for the dynamic array support Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:55 ` [PATCH 09/23] vla: changed string length semantic Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:55 ` [PATCH 19/23] test: accessing dynamic array history values Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:55 ` [PATCH 18/23] test: dynamic arrays passed to functions Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:55 ` [PATCH 22/23] test: test sizeof for dynamic fortran arrays Keven Boell
2014-06-04 5:55 ` [PATCH 01/23] dwarf: add dwarf3 DW_OP_push_object_address opcode Keven Boell
2014-06-05 20:47 ` Tom Tromey
2014-06-11 12:30 ` Keven Boell
2014-06-10 9:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-11 12:26 ` Keven Boell
2014-06-11 13:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-12 7:57 ` Keven Boell
2014-06-12 15:47 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-17 13:52 ` Keven Boell
2014-06-21 15:21 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2014-07-07 15:29 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-04 7:10 ` [PATCH 00/23] Fortran dynamic array support Eli Zaretskii
2014-06-04 12:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-06-14 18:57 ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-14 19:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2014-06-17 13:54 ` Keven Boell
2014-06-17 17:20 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140621152145.GA4417@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=keven.boell@intel.com \
--cc=keven.boell@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sanimir.agovic@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox