From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30965 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2014 17:57:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30954 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jun 2014 17:57:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:57:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s5IHvDFl001710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:57:14 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-53.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.53]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s5IHv94O003315 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:57:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:57:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Regression with default scheduler-locking=step [Re: [pushed] Consecutive step-overs trigger internal error.] Message-ID: <20140618175709.GA9237@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <1398191068-7631-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <20140617192406.GB10997@host2.jankratochvil.net> <53A1998D.7090006@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53A1998D.7090006@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00684.txt.bz2 On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:52:13 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > Here's a fix. Let me know what you think. The change looks OK and as it fixes the assertion I am for the patch. Thanks, Jan