From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 478 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2014 20:53:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 462 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jun 2014 20:53:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 20:53:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s55KrenC020543 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:53:41 -0400 Received: from redacted.bos.redhat.com ([10.18.17.143]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s55Krcwx005256 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:53:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 20:53:00 -0000 From: Kyle McMartin To: Andrew Pinski Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] aarch64: implement walking over the stack protector Message-ID: <20140605205338.GO15355@redacted.bos.redhat.com> References: <20140603050011.GA15355@redacted.bos.redhat.com> <20140603050314.GC15355@redacted.bos.redhat.com> <20140603145108.GF15355@redacted.bos.redhat.com> <20140605200621.GN15355@redacted.bos.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:35:54PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > Finally got a toolchain built that supports ilp32... looks like the > > existing code should work for it. The only difference (not sure if it's > > because of gcc HEAD or what) is using w1 instead of x0 repeated for the > > ldr/str, which looks to be satisfied by the rt/rt2 tests and size=10 > > included in the decode_masked_match. I'll try to build a static ilp32 > > binary to test it meanwhile, but I've had some other issues with gcc > > HEAD. > > Glibc support is not there yet though. I will take over the issue > with ILP32 then. When this goes in, can you file a bug and assign it > to me (pinskia@gcc.gnu.org I think is my email for sourceware > bugzilla)? > Will do. Just ran this sequence through the code 'by hand' and it seems to work on ILP32, fwiw. --Kyle