From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9365 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2014 17:46:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9353 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jun 2014 17:46:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:46:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2232F1161B3; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:46:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2QBbMErt7KUr; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:46:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB9F116160; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:46:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DBF8140EB2; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:46:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb-7.8 branching status (2014-06-04) Message-ID: <20140604174607.GV4289@adacore.com> References: <20140604171843.GX30686@adacore.com> <538F58DE.7030204@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <538F58DE.7030204@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 > > . I just noticed a regression with gdbserver on LynxOS. > > The testing came back just in the nick of time to identify > > the source of the regression: > > commit 802e8e6d8465a0d05803a987ba1bb3237fb2fb70 > > [GDBserver] Make Zx/zx packet handling idempotent. > > I will more into it right away. > > Blasphemy! :-P Hopefully it'll be a simple issue, like, me > installing the new hooks incorrectly.. :-) It looks like a call to a hook which is NULL (supports_z_point_type), which probably shoots down my hope of the same issue affecting Windows as well (there, the hook appears to be non-NULL). I'm trying to see if I should define it for LynxOS or not, but then we have the same issue with SPU, I think. -- Joel