From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12279 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2014 13:43:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12270 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2014 13:43:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:43:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B551161D1; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 09:43:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4sp0Y1qM5avC; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 09:43:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DD511616E; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 09:43:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 304A540E72; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 06:43:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:43:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Doug Evans Cc: Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Keith Seitz Subject: Re: gdb-7.8 branching status update Message-ID: <20140603134341.GN4289@adacore.com> References: <20140602172105.GC30686@adacore.com> <538CB897.6050703@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 > > I've been poking at this one all day long. I noticed something while > > reviewing it, and then hit a stack of issues. I'll reply very soon. > > > > I think the break-interp.exp crashes should be a blocker too: > > > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00731.html > > > > Also, I've now noticed that running the testsuite against > > gdbserver has several regressions compared to a month or > > so ago. :-/ > > I'm not sure this is a blocker, but I've started to notice gdb segvs > in corefile.exp. > vdso target sections are not removed when a new core is loaded, and > gdb is referencing memory from an already-freed bfd. > At any rate I'm going to file a pr tomorrow. I've added an entry in the TODO of our wiki page. If you have a PR, can you add the reference there? From what I understand, Pedro was going to look at it, so I put his name on the entry. Can we get a quick update on where we stand on the performance regression AI? Thanks! -- Joel