From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27409 invoked by alias); 21 May 2014 12:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 27378 invoked by uid 89); 21 May 2014 12:24:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 May 2014 12:24:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4LCOI2u010696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 21 May 2014 08:24:19 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-107.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.107]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4LCOEjY009604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 21 May 2014 08:24:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:24:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Aleksandar Ristovski Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] gdbserver build-id attribute generator Message-ID: <20140521122414.GA14744@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20140319223004.14668.20989.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20140319223115.14668.73456.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <87ppj8tswu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ppj8tswu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00472.txt.bz2 On Tue, 20 May 2014 16:40:33 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: > Jan> - > Jan> - > Jan> + > Jan> + > > I am concerned about versioning of the XML. > Is it correct to keep the same version number? > If so -- why? I wrote a never replied essay + [patch] fix about why the current handling of 'version' is wrong: [patch] gdbserver and its #FIXED version="1.0" https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-11/msg00099.html > Perhaps we consider it compatible to add attributes. Unrelated to the bug referenced above - I think so. > I really don't know; nor did I find anything in the documentation. > So at the very least this needs an update to the manual to warn > future users. I do not understand this. The only changed (newly added) attribute is build-id #IMPLIED - therefore optional - therefore backward/forward compatible. Who needs to be warned about it? Regards, Jan