On Tue, 20 May 2014 17:10:03 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote:
> This bit of code (and another like it later on) should have a longer
> comment, probably at least including the link above, but also some text
> about how this is a hack but why it is ok.

I have put there:
+      /* This code path handles the case of -static -pthread executables:
+	 https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-help/2014-03/msg00024.html
+	 For older GNU libc r_debug.r_map is NULL.  For GNU libc after
+	 PR libc/16831 due to GDB PR threads/16954 LOAD_MODULE is also NULL.
+	 The constant number 1 depends on GNU __libc_setup_tls
+	 initialization of l_tls_modid to 1.  */


> Otherwise this is ok.

Reposting with the comment update.


Jan