From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3052 invoked by alias); 20 May 2014 15:18:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2974 invoked by uid 89); 20 May 2014 15:18:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 May 2014 15:17:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4KFHwHS010217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 11:17:58 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-107.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.107]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4KFHsIm009074 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 20 May 2014 11:17:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 15:18:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix TLS access for -static -pthread Message-ID: <20140520151754.GA27490@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20140410115204.GB16411@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20140411110322.GA13806@host2.jankratochvil.net> <878upwtris.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878upwtris.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00428.txt.bz2 On Tue, 20 May 2014 17:10:35 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: > > Jan> On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:52:04 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > >> Future glibcs may implement more native support for -static -pthread TLS > >> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16828 > >> which will require also some new GDB support. > > Jan> Posted now by Carlos O'Donell: > Jan> [PATCH] Initialize _r_debug for static applications. > Jan> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-04/msg00183.html > Jan> Message-ID: <5347321E.2060802@redhat.com> > > Does this negate the need for the previous patch? No. > Or merely mean that an additional patch is desirable? Yes, filed for GDB such additional patch request as: Improve TLS variables glibc compatibility https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16954 Jan