From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11037 invoked by alias); 15 May 2014 17:56:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11023 invoked by uid 89); 15 May 2014 17:56:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 15 May 2014 17:56:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AA41161AF; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PXSiNAaaSvUi; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CAF116194; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 01BBAE13F0; Thu, 15 May 2014 10:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 17:56:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Keith Seitz Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: [RFA 0/9] Explicit locations v2 - Introduction Message-ID: <20140515175649.GD4016@adacore.com> References: <536BC52D.80800@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <536BC52D.80800@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 Hey Keith, I did a quick testing session of those patches. First of all, it passes our internal testsuite on x86_64-linux :). But more interestingly, you asked me if I could try it out with some of operators, whose name have double-quotes in them. It seems to be working pretty well, for instance: (gdb) break -f "+" Breakpoint 1 at 0x401d8a: -f "+". (2 locations) Or using the fully-qualified symbol name: (gdb) b -f ops."-" Breakpoint 3 at 0x401da4: -f ops."-". (2 locations) The only part that I found to be odd was that I tried to be a little more selective in which operator I wanted to break on, by specifying the line number: (gdb) b -f ops."-" -l 15 Breakpoint 4 at 0x401da4: -f ops."-" -l 15. (2 locations) I still got 2 locations, one of them not being at line 15: (gdb) info break 4 breakpoint [...] 4.1 [...] 0x0000000000401da4 in ops."-" at ops.adb:15 4.2 [...] 0x0000000000401ff3 in ops."-" at ops.adb:109 But maybe this part wasn't part of this patch's objectives yet... -- Joel