From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-112004-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26449 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2014 12:36:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 26439 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2014 12:36:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: rock.gnat.com
Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:36:38 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DFA1160B0;	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:36:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with LMTP id 7gJ4-8WBEF2y; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:36:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EEC116091;	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 08:36:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)	id 7F3A5E064D; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 05:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:36:00 -0000
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,	gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] [gdb/testsuite] include a use of the definition of a type to cause clang to emit debug info
Message-ID: <20140424123637.GF18355@adacore.com>
References: <CAENS6EvK8+AUQrj_0q2vAz0JH-5Pt0Z=cRWtW--4pyyUTP3WfQ@mail.gmail.com> <21336.22730.235280.1770@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <CADPb22R3EZ1XeDMB_nY79zd4crNu_Yd63gedr0s=q63+sz3BNg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22R3EZ1XeDMB_nY79zd4crNu_Yd63gedr0s=q63+sz3BNg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00494.txt.bz2

> Bleah.  Sorry Joel.  I didn't see your earlier mail.

No problem. As I explained, I don't have a strong opinion
on this, and it was fine if you guys disagreed with me.

> What do you think of adding a testcase that explicitly tests the
> user's expectation?
> [per Pedro's suggestion]

That would work.

-- 
Joel