From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12328 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2014 16:13:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12319 invoked by uid 89); 21 Apr 2014 16:13:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:13:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83121160C9; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 12:13:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id kXqrdSWQeHTI; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 12:13:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988891160BF; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 12:13:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 11BB9E09B7; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:13:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: git cherry-pick -x Message-ID: <20140421161315.GG4477@adacore.com> References: <83ioq4fmkg.fsf@gnu.org> <20140421160651.GD4477@adacore.com> <838uqyd5m5.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <838uqyd5m5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00412.txt.bz2 > > Watch out for one little nit: If the revision log is a single-line > > log, then the extra info is added right after it, breaking the > > convention that the second line of revision logs should always be > > empty. > > Don't we always include the ChangeLog entries after the 1st line of > the commit message? Right - something I meant to say, that it's likely not going to affect us, except in unusual situations maybe. -- Joel