From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24616 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2014 16:37:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24605 invoked by uid 89); 27 Mar 2014 16:37:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:37:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2RGbMr0017516 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:37:22 -0400 Received: from redacted.bos.redhat.com ([10.18.17.143]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2RGbKW9019169 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:37:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:37:00 -0000 From: Kyle McMartin To: Marcus Shawcroft Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] aarch64: detect atomic sequences like other ll/sc architectures Message-ID: <20140327163720.GK3075@redacted.bos.redhat.com> References: <20140327015125.GE3075@redacted.bos.redhat.com> <20140327154033.GI3075@redacted.bos.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00636.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 04:12:55PM +0000, Marcus Shawcroft wrote: > >> This also looks wrong. > >> > > > > Eh... I tested all 24 possible ldxr/stxr opcodes... > > Kyle > You are right, sorry, I can't read the encoding tables. This mask and > pattern is indeed sensible. > No worries at all, I'm glad you made me double check. :) --Kyle