From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11627 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2014 16:28:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11616 invoked by uid 89); 24 Mar 2014 16:28:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:28:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2OGSC1v021531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:28:12 -0400 Received: from redacted.bos.redhat.com ([10.18.17.143]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2OGS9sf032751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:28:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:28:00 -0000 From: Kyle McMartin To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: detect atomic sequences like other ll/sc architectures Message-ID: <20140324162809.GC23291@redacted.bos.redhat.com> References: <20140324161056.GB23291@redacted.bos.redhat.com> <53305C5A.5000001@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53305C5A.5000001@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00578.txt.bz2 On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:24:58PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > Hi! > > On 03/24/2014 04:10 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > > Add similar single-stepping over atomic sequences support like other > > load-locked/store-conditional architectures (alpha, powerpc, arm, etc.) > > do. Verified the decode_masked_match, and decode_bcond works against the > > atomic sequences used in the Linux kernel atomic.h, and also gcc > > libatomic. Thanks to Richard Henderson for feedback on my initial > > attempt at this patch! > > Thanks! It'd be nice to have a test in the test suite. Could you > add one? > > PPC64's equivalent seems to be gdb.arch/ppc64-atomic-inst.c|exp. > Absolutely, I'll work on a set of tests for this today. --Kyle