From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11913 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2014 13:16:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11901 invoked by uid 89); 12 Mar 2014 13:16:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:16:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2CDGA7G007564 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:16:10 -0400 Received: from blade.nx (ovpn-116-44.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.44]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2CDG9KM031462 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:16:09 -0400 Received: by blade.nx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E8910263EE1; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:16:07 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:16:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't mention "Unix" in native target name. Message-ID: <20140312131607.GA5531@blade.nx> References: <1394627872-18619-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1394627872-18619-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00288.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > I wonder whether anyone would miss this badly? The difference would be: > > (gdb) maint print target-stack > The current target stack is: > - multi-thread (multi-threaded child process.) > - - child (Unix child process) > + - child (Child process) > - exec (Local exec file) > - None (None) > > (gdb) help target child > - Unix child process (started by the "run" command). > + Child process (started by the "run" command). > > I find it unnecessary (and really slightly a lie) on GNU/Linux. > > It's also odd that e.g., the Windows port says "Unix" in reaction to > "target child" (it was already that way before Windows used > inf-child.c). > > How about we just say the same mostly everywhere? I'm all for this. > In the same vein, I'd also rename Solaris/procfs.c's "target procfs" > to "target child". Ditto. Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/