From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12538 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2014 09:07:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12526 invoked by uid 89); 12 Mar 2014 09:06:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:06:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D9E1164C6; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 05:06:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ucVNw8WUcUBz; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 05:06:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA77116493; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 05:06:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 92C7EE03A3; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 02:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:07:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Make the windows-nat.c target inherit inf-child.c. Message-ID: <20140312090656.GF4882@adacore.com> References: <1394205292-19784-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1394205292-19784-3-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <531F3CF8.8070208@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <531F3CF8.8070208@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00279.txt.bz2 Hi Pedro, > I wonder whether anyone with easier Windows than me wants > to run this through the test suite? Otherwise, with the > little Wine test I did, I'm pretty sure I didn't break > things too much. :-) I ran this patch against our testsuite on Windows, and found no regression. I think it's good :-)... -- Joel