From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1686 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2014 13:26:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1675 invoked by uid 89); 6 Mar 2014 13:26:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:26:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCC511667F; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:26:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HrBRokgKcn9L; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:26:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCEA11651E; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:26:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B78B7E0CE3; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:26:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:26:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Error on bad count number Message-ID: <20140306132642.GF16858@adacore.com> References: <1394023608-10761-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1394023608-10761-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <20140305142939.GB16858@adacore.com> <531749BA.8050806@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <531749BA.8050806@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00155.txt.bz2 > I had the same thought. I wondered whether 0 was meant to > remove the enable count, but the docs don't say anything > about it. Is there another way to disable the count, and > bring back the disposition to enabled? If not, I wonder > whether using 0 for that would be a good idea? I forgot to answer this. I did not realize that one could not remove the counter. zero would work. Perhaps we could also have a special keyword that would make things a little more explicit? -- Joel