From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9936 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2014 15:29:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9926 invoked by uid 89); 4 Mar 2014 15:29:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 15:29:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0890C1161E7; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:29:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id frT7xYM67HM4; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:29:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49E61161DA; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:29:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 877E2E097A; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 07:29:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 15:29:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2] fix regressions with target-async Message-ID: <20140304152918.GD4893@adacore.com> References: <1393609699-26407-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <5310D2F9.2090507@redhat.com> <87mwh7cks4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <5314AFEA.8020705@redhat.com> <87y50q9h3e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87fvmy9eyx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fvmy9eyx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 > Tom> Nope. I dug into this a bit and after a git bisect -- thanks once again > Tom> to IBM for gcc111, quite a nice machine -- I'm sorry to report that the > Tom> AIX solib rewrite seems to have broken thread debugging there. > > FWIW I am inclined to go forward with v3 of this patch, which I will > send shortly. It doesn't make the AIX situation any worse; and it does > fix some regressions. Let me know what you think. Sorry I broke threading on AIX. It's strange that I did, since I thought I had tested threading support too. I agree it's fine to go ahead with your changes, I will take care of fixing AIX as soon as I have a moment. -- Joel