From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25268 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2014 18:54:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25256 invoked by uid 89); 28 Feb 2014 18:54:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:54:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD5D116390; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:54:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tclrhxnPhKPB; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:54:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057A7116359; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:54:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 46E3BE03BD; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:54:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:54:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2] fix regressions with target-async Message-ID: <20140228185442.GB4893@adacore.com> References: <1393609699-26407-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <5310D2F9.2090507@redhat.com> <874n3jf5zz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <5310DAAE.3040207@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5310DAAE.3040207@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00884.txt.bz2 > > Now that there's a public AIX box I suppose I have no excuse. I'll give > > it a try and see what happens. If it fails then I think we'll need some > > explicit field on the target rather than trying to deduce properties of > > the target based on whether it implements some methods. > > I'm sure that if something goes wrong with AIX, we can sort out aix-thread.c > out. There's should really be no need to push the thread_stratum > target early before there's a process. linux-thread-db.c gets by > without that just fine, so just this. For AIX, you can also leave the testing to me... -- Joel