From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31680 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2014 20:58:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31669 invoked by uid 89); 27 Feb 2014 20:58:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:58:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1RKwBkY027083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:58:11 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-18.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.18]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1RKw7Wq020471 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:58:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:58:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [commit] [patch] Fix solib list reading asan error (for PR 8882) Message-ID: <20140227205807.GA19899@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20140226220918.GA10431@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20140227201731.GA18067@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201402272056.s1RKufPE026880@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201402272056.s1RKufPE026880@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00839.txt.bz2 On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:56:41 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > And I agree, so I committed the diff below as obvious. I also agree. Thanks, Jan