From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29139 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2014 14:29:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29129 invoked by uid 89); 27 Feb 2014 14:29:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:29:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EE31161AD; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:29:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rzYPFs9SNHXP; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:29:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D40411616A; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:29:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9CDA0E04D4; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:29:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:29:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mark Wielaard Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/DWARF] Set enum type "flag_enum" and "unsigned" flags at type creation. Message-ID: <20140227142904.GP4348@adacore.com> References: <1390796357-3739-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <1392820455.21975.235.camel@bordewijk.wildebeest.org> <1392823115.21975.238.camel@bordewijk.wildebeest.org> <20140226183157.GF4348@adacore.com> <1393497031.8933.208.camel@bordewijk.wildebeest.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1393497031.8933.208.camel@bordewijk.wildebeest.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00825.txt.bz2 > Sorry, I didn't have gcc-gnat installed and so missed this. I have it > installed now. BTW. Are there any overviews of what are expected > results? For make check RUNTESTFLAGS='--directory gdb.ada' I get: > > === gdb Summary === > > # of expected passes 490 > # of unexpected failures 29 > # of unexpected successes 8 > # of expected failures 2 > # of known failures 1 > # of unsupported tests 3 > > Is that reasonable? The amount of failures seems a bit high. The > testsuite is not supposed to be (near) zero-fail? IMO, it depends too much on the compiler used. Although we try to actively contribute all our GCC patches the same way we contribute our GDB patches, there are always a few that keep missing in the FSF tree. To have near-clean results, I think you would need to use our latest GPL'ed binary (we publish one each year). That's why you'll see me generate C testcases as much as possible, even if the problem is only showing up in Ada code. Regardless of that, I don't expect anyone but me to really set their environment up towards clean results. As long as it's not regressing in your environment, I'm happy taking take care of accidental regressions. -- Joel