From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24409 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2014 14:10:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24366 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2014 14:09:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:09:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665D411663A; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:09:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id wePDVwAHxv6d; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:09:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320011165D5; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:09:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 19E68E10D9; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:09:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:10:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] Adjust ia64_linux_xfer_partial following to_xfer_partial API change. Message-ID: <20140226140952.GC4348@adacore.com> References: <1393345450-20878-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <530CD37F.3050106@redhat.com> <20140226021446.GA4348@adacore.com> <530DCD06.6060506@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <530DCD06.6060506@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00780.txt.bz2 > > BTW: Now that I have pushed the patch, I just realized something. > > Are you sure the gate_table_size is a constant? >:-o > > I believe so. Notice that create_gate_table is an __init function > (means it runs only once, at boot time). I now grepped the > kernel tree for gate_table_size, and saw nowhere else changing it. Thanks! It wasn't completely obviouus to me - but then, it was late in the day right during a time when jetlag is the worst :). And thanks again for the patch. -- Joel