From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32669 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2014 19:42:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32647 invoked by uid 89); 12 Feb 2014 19:42:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:42:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1CJfvZb018932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:41:58 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-31.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.31]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1CJ1nSe017064 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:01:49 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:42:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] rl78: vtables are code addresses Message-ID: <20140212120149.5733ce16@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <52FB77E8.7090402@redhat.com> References: <20140210234449.27faedc6@redhat.com> <52F9FE9D.6050603@redhat.com> <20140211093820.23de6ad4@redhat.com> <52FB77E8.7090402@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00431.txt.bz2 On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:32:24 +0000 Pedro Alves wrote: > On 02/11/2014 04:38 PM, Kevin Buettner wrote: > > > Very nice. I've tested your patch and find that it produces > > results identical to what I was getting with my patch. Please > > check it in... > > Alright, I've pushed it now, as below. Thanks! Kevin