From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14940 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2014 13:15:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14928 invoked by uid 89); 8 Feb 2014 13:15:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:15:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04471164E1; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 08:15:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ffkvUJFeqGhn; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 08:15:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D59E1164D4; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 08:15:34 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 53383E0986; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 17:15:33 +0400 (RET) Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:15:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Yao Qi Cc: andre , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Test no =breakpoint-modified is emitted for modifications from MI commands Message-ID: <20140208131533.GN5485@adacore.com> References: <1390549587-23625-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <52F381B0.4010602@codesourcery.com> <20140206203936.GA7055@klara.mpi.htwm.de> <52F4A366.6060704@codesourcery.com> <20140207161221.GA5150@klara.mpi.htwm.de> <20140208031854.GM5485@adacore.com> <52F5A67A.7010301@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52F5A67A.7010301@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 > > One other possible option: Add a new option that would be available > > to all commands to disable notifications related to the command being > > executed. That way, FE could use it to reduce unnecessary back-chatter. > > That is what I am thinking about. > > > I don't really like that option, though, as it would require a certain > > transition period. > > What do you mean by "transition period"? We can make use of > "-list-features" to tell FE that FE can disable/enable MI notifications > through a certain command. The issue is people using older versions of an FE with a newer version of GDB. For those, their FE wouldn't know about the new option and thus get the notifications that they might not expect. I don't know if we need to be concerned about this sort of compatibility or not... -- Joel