From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix passing double float complex arguments in sparc64
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 02:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140208024729.GJ5485@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mwi5s7me.fsf@oracle.com>
Hi Jose,
Sorry about the delay....
> 2013-10-15 Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
>
> * sparc64-tdep.c (sparc64_store_arguments): Do not align complex
> double float arguments to 16-byte in the argument slots.
One remark and a question...
> if (regnum != -1)
> {
> regcache_cooked_write (regcache, regnum, valbuf);
> + if (sparc64_complex_floating_p (type)
> + && (len == 16)
> + && (regnum < SPARC64_D30_REGNUM))
> + regcache_cooked_write (regcache, regnum + 1, valbuf + 8);
I think this part should be moved next to where complex_floating_point
types are handled in terms of setting regnum. It seems to be the way
things are done for other situations like this.
> /* If we're storing the value in a floating-point register,
> also store it in the corresponding %0 register(s). */
> if (regnum >= SPARC64_D0_REGNUM && regnum <= SPARC64_D10_REGNUM)
> {
> + int dregnum = regnum;
> gdb_assert (element < 6);
> regnum = SPARC_O0_REGNUM + element;
> regcache_cooked_write (regcache, regnum, valbuf);
> + if (sparc64_complex_floating_p (type)
> + && (len == 16)
> + && (dregnum < SPARC64_D10_REGNUM))
> + regcache_cooked_write (regcache, regnum + 1, valbuf + 8);
I think the same is true of this hunk, no? Also, I don't see the reason
why you're defining a new variable dregnum which is just a copy of
regnum.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-08 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-23 15:01 Jose E. Marchesi
2014-02-05 19:02 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-02-08 2:47 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2014-02-10 13:22 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-02-11 4:45 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-02-11 12:39 ` Jose E. Marchesi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-15 15:55 Jose E. Marchesi
2013-10-23 19:58 ` Mark Kettenis
2013-12-10 18:46 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2013-12-11 12:29 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2013-12-11 14:09 ` Jose E. Marchesi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140208024729.GJ5485@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox