From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-109944-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10397 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2014 17:59:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 10387 invoked by uid 89); 5 Feb 2014 17:59:09 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 17:59:08 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s15Hx1qb006993;	Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:59:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id s15Hx0JB002993;	Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:59:00 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 17:59:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201402051759.s15Hx0JB002993@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: ysato@users.sourceforge.jp
CC: palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <878utpfnxs.wl%ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> (message from	Yoshinori Sato on Thu, 06 Feb 2014 02:51:11 +0900)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] h8300 "info registers" broken
References: <8738k3j95o.wl%ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>	<52F14184.9020803@redhat.com> <878utpfnxs.wl%ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 02:51:11 +0900
> From: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
> > Can you explain the patch to me a little bit more, please?
> > It's not obvious to me at all what the register names
> > have to with the proposed change.
> 
> Current h8300-tdep have two problems.
> 1. Size mismatch in pseudo register vs raw register.
>    So overflow on register cache.

That doesn't make sense.  Pseudo registers don't live in the register
cache.  Instead they are synthesised from the contents of the register
cache.

> 2. Undisplay pseudo regsters.

Not sure what you're trying to say here.  But if you don't want to
show a pseudo register, why do you have it in the first place?