From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9056 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2014 12:24:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9047 invoked by uid 89); 5 Feb 2014 12:24:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:24:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8F111655F; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:24:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0V1MXZeLRAu8; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:24:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8465D11643C; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:24:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83701E0613; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:24:45 +0400 (RET) Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:24:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Yao Qi Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, marc.khouzam@ericsson.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Create inferior fro trace file target Message-ID: <20140205122445.GC5485@adacore.com> References: <1391060652-10870-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <52F15433.5070305@redhat.com> <52F22B49.2050802@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52F22B49.2050802@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 > > We've moved in the direction of "always a thread" a while ago, > > What is "always a thread"? Can you elaborate? This was a change where even non-threaded programs would have a thread. > > In any case, both patches look OK to me, and I agree it's best to > > avoid breaking Eclipse since we don't have a really good reason to > > change behavior compared to previous releases right now. So, OK > > for both. Thanks for fixing this. > > Thanks for the review. Two patches are pushed to both mainline and 7.7 > branch. Thanks! I will create the release tomorrow morning! -- Joel