Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: heads up: GDB 7.7 official release Wed Jan 29th (tomorrow)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201401281822.s0SIMWLd002802@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140128180722.GJ4101@adacore.com> from "Joel Brobecker" at Jan 28, 2014 10:07:22 PM

Joel Brobecker wrote:

> > So I guess I'm wondering if you see workable options to still
> > get powerpc64le-linux support into a release in the near future ...
> > Maybe we could do a 7.7.1 ?
> 
> I'm a bit uncomfortable including support for a new target like that
> without more testing, particularly since the changes affects files
> already in use by other ports. I had a quick look, and perhaps the
> changes can be reviewed well enough to convince ourselves that they
> are indeed safe enough for the branch.
> 
> Here is what I propose:
> 
>   1. We delay the release to Monday (Feb 3rd).
> 
>   2. During that time frame, let's try to get the changes reviewed
>      by at least one more GM - it might be me.

I would certainly appreciate that -- thanks!

As to changes in other ports, I think it should be pretty clear
that non-PowerPC platforms cannot really be affected.  (There are
some changes to common code in the 11/11 patch, but that shouldn't
affect any platform that do not define gdbarch_skip_entrypoint.)

As to other PowerPC platforms, I've tested powerpc64-linux quite a
bit -- I would be happy to also run a regression test on a 32-bit
Linux and on AIX.

> It would be good to get a sense of when people think gcc-4.9 is going
> to come out. Last I looked, the branch hadn't been created yet.
> Perhaps, one option is to schedule 7.8 to coincide with gcc-4.9
> (or slightly before, if we'd like to).

I guess that might be OK as a fall-back solution.

Thanks,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-28 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-28  2:31 Joel Brobecker
2014-01-28  4:02 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-01-28 14:59   ` Joel Brobecker
2014-01-28 17:49 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-01-28 18:07   ` Joel Brobecker
2014-01-28 18:22     ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2014-01-29  8:14       ` Joel Brobecker
2014-01-29  9:31         ` Mark Kettenis
2014-01-29 18:57           ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-01-29 11:05 Tobias Burnus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201401281822.s0SIMWLd002802@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox