From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26183 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2014 14:59:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26173 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jan 2014 14:59:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:59:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB1D1162DE; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:59:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QI8vlxKe-Aag; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:59:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35601162C3; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:59:18 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 44244E05A2; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:59:15 +0400 (RET) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:59:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Edjunior Barbosa Machado Subject: Re: heads up: GDB 7.7 official release Wed Jan 29th (tomorrow) Message-ID: <20140128145915.GH4101@adacore.com> References: <20140128023118.GC4101@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00996.txt.bz2 > This is definitely not a blocker, but I'd like to know what are the > status of the patches submitted by Edjunior for PPC64. There is at > least one of them which solves a false-positive, so for the sake of > avoiding wasting time if someone finds these "failures" in the future, > it might be good to check those in. OK, thanks for the heads up. It doesn't sounds like it would be blocking indeed, but I'll wait for EdJ's feedback if he can send it today or tomorrow... Thanks, -- Joel