From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25781 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2014 07:14:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25770 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jan 2014 07:14:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:14:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A024A116402; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 02:14:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id IB8YyMEj1a8w; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 02:14:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FAB116401; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 02:14:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AC9F7E0BEF; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:14:52 +0400 (RET) Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:14:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Yao Qi Cc: GDB Administrator , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New ARI warning Tue Jan 21 01:52:58 UTC 2014 Message-ID: <20140123071452.GJ4762@adacore.com> References: <20140121015258.GA9519@sourceware.org> <20140123060229.GH4762@adacore.com> <52E0B3AC.8000207@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52E0B3AC.8000207@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00891.txt.bz2 > I am not familiar with ARI, but looks like it is a false alarm of > deprecated rule. ARI thinks "deprecated_warn_user" is a deprecated > "warn_user", but it isn't. I think you're right. Somehow, the message read well enought that it seemed like it was a check specific to that one symbol. -- Joel