From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29124 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2014 09:55:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29112 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jan 2014 09:55:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 09:55:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FED211624B; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 04:55:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yAZyf2vZG3jv; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 04:55:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144E311624E; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 04:55:13 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E8FDFE0816; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:55:10 +0400 (RET) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 09:55:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Marcus Shawcroft Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: gdb.base/float.exp: Fix `info float' test Message-ID: <20140115095510.GI4762@adacore.com> References: <20140115034527.GH4762@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00493.txt.bz2 > >> gdb/testsuite/ > >> * gdb.base/float.exp: Handle "aarch64*-*-*" targets. > > FWIW, no problem with the patch. But I don't know AArch64. > > Does it always have an FPU? Otherwise, we perhaps should look at > > what is being done for arm-*? [...] > The architecture defines three profiles. The relevant profile in this > context is 'A' profile, which requires the presence of the FPU. OK, thanks for confirming it. The patch looks good, then, so let's get it in. Thank you, -- Joel