From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8254 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2013 03:11:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8245 invoked by uid 89); 28 Dec 2013 03:11:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 03:11:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D05116561; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:11:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uSY-IVj2gZ4i; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:11:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FED51164E1; Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:11:04 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 60807E0833; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 07:11:01 +0400 (RET) Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 03:11:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.7 branching on Monday? Message-ID: <20131228031101.GB4532@adacore.com> References: <20131219175908.GH3493@adacore.com> <20131220032812.GJ3493@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00972.txt.bz2 > Just a heads-up: the AArch64 patch has been submitted and pre-reviewed > by Yufeng Zhang and Marcus Shawcroft (both from ARM), but I still need a > maintainer's approval to check it in. That is really helpful, as we now know that the CPU-specific bits should be correct. I will take a look at the trivial bits, now. -- Joel