From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31364 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2013 17:18:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31351 invoked by uid 89); 18 Dec 2013 17:18:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:18:21 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 379991A082F; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:18:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:18:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix cygwin compilation failure due to nameless LOAD_DLL_DEBUG_EVENT causes ntdll.dll to be missing Message-ID: <20131218171819.GY30010@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <52ab8d0e.8aa2420a.30ff.ffffd8f1SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <52AF3493.9090708@redhat.com> <20131218112045.GQ30010@calimero.vinschen.de> <83bo0ecgdw.fsf@gnu.org> <20131218160707.GV30010@calimero.vinschen.de> <834n66ccs9.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CKf/2jVYos1l2hij" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <834n66ccs9.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00711.txt.bz2 --CKf/2jVYos1l2hij Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 651 On Dec 18 19:03, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:07:07 +0100 > > > Are you sure that 32K capability cannot be had with ANSI file names > > > using the \\?\ notation? > >=20 > > Yes. The \\?\ notation only works in the UNICODE API[*]. The reason > > is that the ANSI API is just a thin layer over the actual UNICODE > > functionality, and the conversion from ANSI to UNICODE is done using a > > per-thread fixed-size buffer of 520 bytes. >=20 > Does this mean that using \\?\ with ANSI-encoded file names buys us > 520-byte file names? 260 char ANSI -> 520 bytes UTF-16 Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat --CKf/2jVYos1l2hij Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSsdjbAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gB78P/RWWzgGZEWS/4QTqf1hR9E0u 2r0kRKW93HAg6K0zj2kZna1nlVmrX9h6NTm/Hm/UDX+39h7RiYhzN9gSljfQ9N9W tYOrEydFVIL5K2uXdQi/j/RXAXi1SkDZA/XA54V8WLaGGB9frJ2wj11+sa035Q6/ CKdRH1csPApUpXoBKjDq7QYnnxxIfOkE/00I6owHiI5FzQnpf41j3ia9nqfW9whd 0J+HdqVtlqUVNG5E0H6xURTpmcNh0YU8EJiCfHq0lpByD34qHFjI1NwH+aMsDDWq +rA0xIsxODdOUVgt62RS3cazoV4CASi3ohx32PsoYOg7oA/HGigV6IlYZLI3puio myTYQKL1J1WspMawD8fiaWxLnEWvluGc58swCy7IBvusAgGXN3hOorW8dGN+uXgM tWVbgQ+YhPLmO0NZK7nf4X2sX1LSllGzbFvU8/8jkD1jnO+EhAjCdmaRdBgiSnb9 SNnWJArp4YLADKGKW3cDRquZKjigjbsj+dYZIo2p9vJhuV7jNMYUdf6McngTD/Nw 0YEbCFRycbeS7lkhhA6rvlSLJYKZ0G7ItcnGQQM5hC82zSayySpBm/afTUre0oeg uqIkkmfpCxzpzZGgcsVQWPgAHpC4HxNwNmA8DFZD3OvreZjx1W7RT89cuhKEMuSv V+HD22CyWFIwJ4It9BFh =B3Xf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CKf/2jVYos1l2hij--