From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17278 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2013 20:07:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17265 invoked by uid 89); 18 Dec 2013 20:07:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.gentoo.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:07:16 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E10533F627; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:07:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: Andrew Bennett Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MIPS UFR support Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:07:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.1; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Steve Ellcey References: <0DA23CC379F5F945ACB41CF394B982774C8579@LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org> <0DA23CC379F5F945ACB41CF394B982774DAC91@LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org> <0DA23CC379F5F945ACB41CF394B982774E7990@LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org> In-Reply-To: <0DA23CC379F5F945ACB41CF394B982774E7990@LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1640466.mgOYix0lsm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201312181507.17702.vapier@gentoo.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00723.txt.bz2 --nextPart1640466.mgOYix0lsm Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 812 On Wednesday 18 December 2013 10:36:05 Andrew Bennett wrote: > Steve Ellcey (cc'd on this email) does have copyright assignment for gdb.= =20 > Would you be happy if we used his copyright assignment? Steve is also > happy to submit the patch if you don't want to. anyone who has contributed substantially has to have papers to cover them=20 specifically. if you did it for a company, then that company has to have=20 papers filed (which it seems you did via imgtec). the fact that Steve has= =20 papers in place is irrelevant. so if imgtec has papers covering all of its employees, then that should be= =20 sufficient here. note: i'm not applying these rules because i want to (or even agree with=20 them). the fsf governs this code base, and their rules are to no longer=20 accept unassigned work. -mike --nextPart1640466.mgOYix0lsm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJSsgB1AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBmEcP/0DwS5PZC6y9h4Il83XO3R5a 0pAdWLslvhCSvvacbkDN3SjEb3EsfJHbhw0HTxkMFiBj0USvNTC8SQ7eLdxcPafq J1qajZ8F5SEPMeWqghpsmMBcXQYt0qQTE6lfVCS8co6hec28ltH9zpXiUzeYRzgA yysjx2EjcH3ecIzeUexf/t6J0aHX9clKl1M7r2uVkl6E/lWlSDwfKP6N28qU4gxM 7VmqaJlKYf0wj1cWPrkhDfVpnoy+hmvk4/ITUQYfSMSdzAEiFNNAJfytGktGYE1O fa9JBDAWAdaPOfUjOLu7YuOd/CCUjZ5H3jY1K9xY/qSXyMA0bhd9rjZ8c+Qtg2AC 6h6RJGsgAYp9zlNJngNI1W8C3KJZtEgialDC1W9glaXhSeRHTQQgYx9FUeSK3XJY N+X2jzdknVc5QB8i6WAN4Z9LFH2EkptNHWX2vtCWo9TIcuXUPmmII/0WBnn0QX1W 6zRm/zzZJeswWoAIwDVtOMVreMyhd4t3pwETJ/aRZ2wddZLp2RwcDuvQ0pnf9oOX cEhYUh3TVPZWhpEuDIhlDvzLfYlbZFzdA+3IaK/XKUFDlX4LujKCXKJPMrbj/Uu8 mTSAfr9D6UZro3S13l/GqBVMUPsEnfQ1JeVM4GyUQElyfj0kDqSX4gla5c9z9xrz 94z8GV/eT5bIFDK2Pzlx =azGe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1640466.mgOYix0lsm--