From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21918 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2013 10:43:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21908 invoked by uid 89); 9 Dec 2013 10:43:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from Unknown (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 10:43:23 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4DB011A06F5; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 11:43:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 10:43:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Allow Windows UNWIND_INFO version 2. Message-ID: <20131209104315.GH2527@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1386070345-8237-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <529E274D.607@redhat.com> <20131205034451.GD3175@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IuhbYIxU28t+Kd57" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131205034451.GD3175@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00327.txt.bz2 --IuhbYIxU28t+Kd57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1143 On Dec 5 07:44, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > I'd consider merging with the existing loop, so that > > we print the opcodes when frame debug is enabled. > >=20 > > But anyway, this looks fine to me. >=20 > Thanks, Pedro. Given Tristan's feedback, I decided to push the patch > as is. But I remain available to make additional changes, should > the discussion lead us towards that. >=20 > > I clicked on "Did you find this helpful? No" at: > >=20 > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ck9asaa9.aspx > >=20 > > and asked for info about v2 and opcode 6. Not holding > > my breath though. >=20 > Ha! Good idea, and I will remember to do that too. It's not much > effort, and you never know. I'd suggest to utilize the Microsoft forums at http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home My last bugreport got handled pretty quickly, see http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/073d02a6-1181-4694-9e50-d6a05= bd80663/ Out of curiosity, will there be a followup for this GDB patch submission? Handling the v2 opcodes is rather interesting for Cygwin and Mingw... Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat --IuhbYIxU28t+Kd57 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSpZ7DAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gFfkP/Anh7IwX40PzGsH6CbiRDJE8 0rSGfC936t4WTmIcSY0l7VQ0LYU9+Qv0p80VsCdIro3TEeyttwR6ga9NoliJ9L24 l8R71WRpOsOnnUuqDNdV+k0A+PA+IVYbEUhgeDBl6hVnl6CogbTJP9/UfZe7gcRB Ch/QsJSnNDFfI9zHoqvTtjJhi74pQpLxN+U1lVJrhL34yDieYXvCWtnSoriXDCYw jvyUJEOQWQQ7RHPGJ5E4vEEpZ/P1YXFMtVxqFeriLUhxukbpT/e/5nDO0T5KH8a8 ODyDo8Zg6iQuBBxikwNWrmDGrhAMUZlMKFjh2rRpgf00U+nCPhOVIAvtw71/qRIA 5CXJTKfUfDyQe/wiCRcq9jNvMwopBl0ao633/TOJJpg9lgybV+sQp+my06D3/7MJ 5/Z2VoJ4dbVx1TGClA1uuriGPo9codwm0uZdmhaFYstmnlABythswK1LpZNcBmnD iLI4sBR3X+oV8CpeM9pDYhXtj6DNUgNrHYr55G7DatHd8FJfJPg4HR1fwXozbu5l 4SQhvzho2S311x1eGl5iVBXCQk5ZoCzQoevgOPiium0capKY8OIw23Q1nYawz6WO rv748Ab68TVQzsxmD7RK62KGzapG+R14BM3zMQMGb6m0amtmcB/azPK0+yTLWfsS eNuFOeWqJiQQ2nljQ46H =fnhq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IuhbYIxU28t+Kd57--