From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6536 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2013 21:28:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6523 invoked by uid 89); 2 Dec 2013 21:28:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 21:28:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rB2LSReI025645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:28:28 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-70.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.70]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rB2LSNWg006257 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:28:26 -0500 Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 21:28:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Doug Evans Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches , Philippe Waroquiers Subject: Re: status update for GDB 7.7? Message-ID: <20131202212823.GA19980@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20131202035637.GQ3114@adacore.com> <20131202073623.GA13911@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 20:43:43 +0100, Doug Evans wrote: > What whole new feature/patchset am I *requiring*? > [hint: there is none :-)] The discussion started with: On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:31:22 +0200, Doug Evans wrote: # I was thinking, # We have auto-solib-add and sharedlibrary. # We just need something like that for symfile_objfile. > The subsequent discussion was just discussion of approaching the > problem differently that could have a more general use. > I never argued it was a requirement. OK, so it could be a misunderstanding from me. > If people are ok with that test, then it "works for me". It seems so to me, therefore checked it in now. Regards, Jan