From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21558 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2013 09:49:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21548 invoked by uid 89); 27 Nov 2013 09:49:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:49:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1492F11635D; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 04:49:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8BEvTyjVu2Cq; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 04:49:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A1011634E; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 04:49:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 64B4AE0699; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:49:13 +0400 (RET) Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:22:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Mike Frysinger Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Alexey Makhalov , Tom Tromey Subject: Re: Sim hangs on new target at dup_arg_p() in infinite loop. Message-ID: <20131127094913.GL3114@adacore.com> References: <87a9hgz1ke.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201311270334.44957.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201311270334.44957.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00837.txt.bz2 > > And about copyright assignment, I have no any special one. > > well, the good news is that the sim/ subdir is a mess and we haven't > been enforcing copyright assignment. there is a lot of code in there > not owned by the FSF. considering that, i'm not sure requiring future > submissions in there would be useful if people aren't actively chasing > down past contributors. This is unfortunately a real thorn in our paw, and the FSF wants us to make sure that all new contributions are properly assigned. I'm sorry if this is a bit of a pain, but it should be a one-time process. In the meantime, for those who do not have a copyright assignment in place, we can only accept contributions falling under the "small" or "obvious" exemption. -- Joel