From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16684 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2013 10:08:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16671 invoked by uid 89); 11 Nov 2013 10:08:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl Received: from Unknown (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:08:17 +0000 Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rABA853v021761; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:08:05 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id rABA84oE032562; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:08:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:12:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201311111008.rABA84oE032562@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: walfred.tedeschi@intel.com CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (walfred.tedeschi@intel.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/8] Intel(R) MPX register support References: <1381320034-4092-1-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> <201310201923.r9KJN3O2018018@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <201311041029.rA4ATxrR007449@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00283.txt.bz2 > From: "Tedeschi, Walfred" > Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:15:36 +0000 > > Hello Mark, > > I am not sure I got it right. Is this a ok to commit? Pretty much. > If so, I still would like to do some changes before proceeding. > Basically I want to remove the x32 support since it makes no sense > and a regression I caused. Those changes where mentioned here: > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-10/msg00513.html I'll await your patch then ;). > To avoid sending you a full patch again my Idea is to send an ad-hoc > patch to be added on top of my V7. While doing the commit then I > would join then on the respective place. Not sure what you mean by that. As long as all the intermediate states compile and you don't introduce regressions for non-MPX support, this should be fine.