From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18382 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2013 19:02:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18363 invoked by uid 89); 7 Nov 2013 19:02:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE,SPAM_SUBJECT,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 19:01:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA7J15ZS009344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:01:05 -0500 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-113-183.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.183]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA7J0x3i031713 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:01:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 19:03:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Doug Evans Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches , Pedro Alves , Stan Shebs Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Gold/strip discrepancies for PR 11786 Message-ID: <20131107190059.GA24230@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20131031154957.GA11260@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87li13shk2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20131105172219.GA21529@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20131105180547.GA24004@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20131106212434.GA4193@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:32:08 +0100, Doug Evans wrote: > I don't mind such changes, but these are changes. Agreed? So far I have expexted testsuite should follow the GDB coding standards and reviewers only have various reasons (*) why not to enforce the coding standards so strictly (or at all) for the testsuite. (*) save time of both the submitter and reviewer, making patch acceptance easier for submitters etc. > I was trying to end the thread, and make some minimal mutually agreeable > progress. I would also like so. Jan