From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15430 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2013 08:22:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15408 invoked by uid 89); 22 Oct 2013 08:22:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:22:11 +0000 Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r9M8M04h026335; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:22:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r9M8LxKi011361; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:21:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:22:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201310220821.r9M8LxKi011361@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: jose.marchesi@oracle.com CC: brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <87y55mwzou.fsf@oracle.com> (jose.marchesi@oracle.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SPARC64] Figure out where a longjmp will land References: <87y563k71b.fsf@oracle.com> <87d2nffr53.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87txgrjupm.fsf@oracle.com> <20131017055736.GC3302@adacore.com> <201310201926.r9KJQlD4017034@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <87y55mwzou.fsf@oracle.com> X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00676.txt.bz2 > From: jose.marchesi@oracle.com (Jose E. Marchesi) > Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:55:45 +0200 > > > This looks reasonable to me, with a minor correction requested below. > > But Sparc patches normally get reviewed by MarkK, so can you give it > > another week before checking the final version in? (remember that > > when you check something in that is different from the patch already > > posted, an updated patch should be sent to the list, for the record). > > Well, for the Linux-specific bits it is a good idea to make sure that > David S. Miller sees the changes as well. > > Is he subscribed to gdb-patches? Probably not. > Shall I address him directly? So yes, that might be a good idea. Your last diff is fine with me, so if Dave doesn't respond within a couple of days after you ping him, feel free to move ahead with this.