From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21284 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2013 19:58:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21269 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2013 19:58:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:58:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9BJwTrf008427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:58:29 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-94.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.94]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9BJ0Kkh007945 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:00:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:58:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Luis Machado Cc: "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix calling gcore when gdb is not in $PATH. Message-ID: <20131011190020.GA13493@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <525806C8.8040108@codesourcery.com> <20131011143145.GA1517@host2.jankratochvil.net> <52580F4B.8050306@codesourcery.com> <52582B57.8090006@codesourcery.com> <20131011165622.GA20960@host2.jankratochvil.net> <52583B08.3010907@codesourcery.com> <20131011181008.GA2115@host2.jankratochvil.net> <525841CD.8070506@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <525841CD.8070506@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00398.txt.bz2 On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:22:05 +0200, Luis Machado wrote: > Hmmm... unless there is some discrepancy between shell interpreters, > mine (bash) does the following: OK, true, it works thanks to the 'which' command there. But then why you have there the conditional if test "x$binary_path" = x. ; then ? You can run the 'which' block every time and it will work. Jan