From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10562 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2013 03:56:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10550 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2013 03:56:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 03:56:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC81116191; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 23:57:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9EPPQzvAnfb5; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 23:57:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49960116179; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 23:57:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4708BE0CCA; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 07:56:36 +0400 (RET) Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 03:56:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Yurij Grechishhev Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Setting parity for remote serial Message-ID: <20131008035636.GC3092@adacore.com> References: <87bo6affrh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <524ECCBB.5050307@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00204.txt.bz2 > > IOW, IMO, if we add "set serial parity", > > we should also alias "set remotebaud" to "set serial baud", and whatever > > other commands would make sense (which should be really simple to do). > > That would be great. But it's more comprehensive patch that I have done. > Can we add all "set remotefoo" commands and then alias them > to "set serial foo" at once? > Related discussion: > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2001-09/msg00358.html I'd rather we do it right the first time. If we're a go with the "set serial baud" command, I don't mind taking care of that part. As Pedro hints, it's a fairly easy change to make. Pedro, should we go ahead? It's only been a day or two, but we haven't had any objection so far. -- Joel