From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28018 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2013 10:26:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28007 invoked by uid 89); 30 Sep 2013 10:26:38 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:26:38 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8UAQas9012241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:26:36 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-66.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.66]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8UAQW0Q024784 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:26:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:26:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: "Metzger, Markus T" Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [patch v4 18/24] record-btrace: extend unwinder Message-ID: <20130930102632.GA29815@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <1372842874-28951-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1372842874-28951-19-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <20130818190842.GN24153@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130927135521.GB13376@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg01005.txt.bz2 On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:44:41 +0200, Metzger, Markus T wrote: > Thanks. I'll incorporate it into the extend unwinder patch. > > Given that we always throw an error for BTRACE frames, there's no > need to get the stop reason first or to skip inline frames; they won't > be mixed with BTRACE frames. OK, fine with that. Thanks, Jan