From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14111 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2013 00:34:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14098 invoked by uid 89); 26 Sep 2013 00:34:45 -0000 Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:34:45 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,SPAM_SUBJECT autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD87F116153; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:34:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id iyvfaZqCXkdf; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:34:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5887E116134; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:34:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A3BFE0FB8; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 17:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:34:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, 'Mark Kettenis' Subject: Re: [RFC-v2] amd64-windows: Fix funcall with by-pointer arguments Message-ID: <20130926003441.GB3359@adacore.com> References: <20130920232017.GU3132@adacore.com> <1380040404-16932-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <000301ceb971$b0cdbf80$12693e80$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000301ceb971$b0cdbf80$12693e80$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00911.txt.bz2 > Diffgdb-0.sum and gdb-1.sum is given below, > most of the FAIL->PASS are related to the fact that your > patch mishandles "long double" types and passes them > in xmm register when the need to be handled as copy-on-stack and pass > stack-address. > > I will try to separate the patch into smaller pieces > for easier review. Thank you, Pierre. -- Joel