Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>,
	Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>,
	binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Release 2.24
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130919122028.GP3132@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1309182238430.4379@tp.orcam.me.uk>

>  I reckon the original plan was to make the steps in the reverse order so 
> that there's no pressure from outstanding releases to get the GIT tree in 
> order, which I found reasonable -- what was the rationale behind changing 
> the plan?  It has somehow escaped me (a list archive reference will do).

Pretty much everyone who answered felt that it was more work to keep
two systems around for the duration of the branch. In GDB, branches
are active for about 6 months, which is a long time, and for Binutils,
it is 1 year, I believe. I was the only one who initially did not want
to tie the 2 together, but I changed my mind, and decided to wait
a bit, and give the full-git approach a shot.

-- 
Joel


  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-19 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2741C968-721F-46E9-A2BA-E4B0F64C444B@adacore.com>
     [not found] ` <BB32BE2A-A3CC-494C-9FB2-CFD322F49EA3@adacore.com>
2013-09-18 20:56   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-09-18 21:32     ` Joel Brobecker
2013-09-18 22:26       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-09-19 12:20         ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2013-11-18 16:58         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-11-18 17:25           ` Joel Brobecker
2013-11-21 19:33             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-11-22  3:02               ` Joel Brobecker
2013-11-22  3:28                 ` H.J. Lu
2013-11-22  4:22                   ` Joel Brobecker
2013-11-23 19:12                   ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2013-11-22  8:17                 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-11-22 15:01                 ` Tom Tromey
2013-11-24 10:07                   ` Joel Brobecker
2013-11-25  9:49               ` Tristan Gingold
2013-11-25  9:52                 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-11-25 12:19                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-11-25 12:56                     ` Joel Brobecker
2013-12-02 16:21                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-12-02 19:51                         ` Richard Sandiford
2013-12-03  2:52                           ` Joel Brobecker
2013-12-06 23:55                             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2013-12-07  3:37                               ` Joel Brobecker
2013-12-08  3:56                                 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-12-08  8:40                                   ` Joel Brobecker
2013-09-19  3:59       ` Jeff Law
2013-09-20 13:15         ` Michael Matz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130919122028.GP3132@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gingold@adacore.com \
    --cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=rdsandiford@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox