From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14859 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2013 14:19:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14850 invoked by uid 89); 13 Sep 2013 14:19:32 -0000 Received: from e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.106) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:19:32 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:16:11 +0100 Received: from d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.15) by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.140) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:16:09 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171451B0805D for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:19:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r8DEJESe655870 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:19:14 GMT Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r8DEJP4J007868 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:19:25 -0600 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with SMTP id r8DEJNTe007783; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:19:23 -0600 Message-Id: <201309131419.r8DEJNTe007783@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:19:23 +0200 Subject: Re: [RFA][PATCH v5 0/2] S/390: Add TDB regset support To: arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Andreas Arnez) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:19:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <877genmltz.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> from "Andreas Arnez" at Sep 11, 2013 05:15:04 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: No X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13091314-4966-0000-0000-000006E3278C X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00403.txt.bz2 Andreas Arnez wrote: > Another attempt on adding the TDB regset for S/390 targets. This > version avoids introducing dynamic regset support. Instead, the TDB > regset is unconditionally written into a core dump. Upon reading, > before supplying the TDB to the regcache, its validity is verified. If > invalid, the TDB registers are cleared to "unavailable" status. > > Common code should no longer be affected by this version of the patch > set. I've committed both patches now. Thanks, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com